John Dunn

John Dunn home page
Book sales
Blog
Thought Pieces
Archive
Contact

Blog

Next Entry

Plantagenets

Tuesday, 10 April 2018 at 21:35

Richard II on Dr John Dunn. The confrontation between kings with absolutist designs and nobles protecting their feudalprivileges was central to Shakespeare’s history plays about the Plantagenet dynasty. Plantagenets, John Dunn and others. King John was portrayed as attempting to justify his attempts to assert his own power and arbitrary and violent actions, with speeches about how his legitimacy as king was derived directly from God (which opposed the Guelphic assertion that the Pope must intervene). Shakespeare presented Richard II (left) challenging feudal precedents, seizing lands to finance wars and justifying his action by claiming the divine right of kings. Rejecting these violations of the Diocletian Order, Bolingbroke led the revolt against Richard, illegitimately crowning himself as Henry IV.

The consequent lack of legitimacy runs like a curse through Shakespeare’s histories of Henry IV, Henry V, Henry VI and Richard III and, throughout them all, kings remain at odds with squabbling factions of the nobility. Whilst regent, Richard seized power and crowned himself Richard III. By the end of Act IV of Shakespeare’s play, everyone else, including Richard's own mother the Duchess, has turned against Richard,who even refers to himself as ‘the formal Vice, Iniquity’. The future Henry VII, as the Earl of Richmond, enters into the play in Act V to overthrow Richard and save the state from his tyranny, effectively being the instantaneous new protagonist. Henry is a clear contrast to Richard's evil character, which makes the audience see him as such.


© John Dunn.

In the pores

Monday, 9 April 2018 at 20:47

Usurers on Dr John Dunn. William Langland wrote, ‘He called that house Unity - which is Holy Church in English’. Yet no one was more aware than Langland of the crumbling Christian edifice. The whole of Piers the Ploughmanis an impassioned plea for social and religious reform, so much so thathe has sometimes been regarded as a harbinger of the Protestant Reformation. But his emphasis was always on a forlorn call to unity: ‘Call we to all the Commons that they come into Unity and there stand and do battle against Belial’s children.’

Until Langland’s time,markets had played a subordinate, local role, hemmed in by the limited economic boundaries of the feudal world. Human beings, land and money were not subject to the laws of the market. Non-economic norms set by the political and religious hierarchies regulated human labour and the ownership of land, neither of which were commercially transferable. ‘Belial’s children’ however, would not be held at bay. Though trafficking in money was notionally blocked by the religious prohibitionof usury, it continued to be carried out in increasing volumes by thoseexcluded from feudal society, forced to live on its margins or in its pores. The money germ would not be dislodged and eventually it would eataway Christendom.


© John Dunn.

Commoditised

Saturday, 7 April 2018 at 21:21

Langland Dreamer on Dr John Dunn. 'Langland's Dreamer': from an illuminated initial in a Piers Plowman manuscript held at Corpus Christi College, Oxford.

It all began with money, with the forces of usury circumventing, and later breaking, the religious prohibition of interest-taking. Langland, John Dunn, interpretation.Then came commercial transactions in land, which struck a mortal blow against feudalism. Finally it was the turn of human labour, with man himself turned into a commodity by the slave trade and with the establishment of the wages system. The labour force, transformed into a commodity, became subject, like all others, to the laws of the market.

The common acceptance of the need to combat the relent-less encroachments of usury upon the social organism, as demonstrated especially in the excommunicative strictures of the Council of Lyons (1274), marked the epitome of the medieval synthesis, a time when Europe was as close to being unified as it would ever be. And it was the papal role in calling the Council and others like it that demonstrated the role of the Christian Church in holding together a diverse, scattered, heterogeneous collection of people in a common citizenship, as a spiritual confraternity. The Church became responsible for education, art, literature, the care of the poor and the comfort of the dying. Immediately after the Council of Lyons, however, Christian unity was irredeemably shattered by political rivalries in which the Papacy itselfwas often a participant.

William Langland’s poem Piers the Ploughman (written circa 1360–87) is the perfect expression of this decline with its sense of ruin, yet hope for rebirth should the right choices be made. The anguished protests of the poem ring out against the defeat of true Christianity by the spirit of hardened selfishness.


© John Dunn.

Wholly conscious

Friday, 6 April 2018 at 20:59

Louis XI on Dr John Dunn. Louis XI

The success of Louis XI in making the ideas of Dante, Nicholas of Cusa and Plethon a reality can be measured by the fact that, when he was crowned,France had fourteen feudal duchies and ninety four major cities, which he unified on the basis of common development opportunities as a modern nation state. His reforms in tax policy, universal coinage, and administrative and judicial reorganisation made this absolutist monarch the scourge of the feudal lords and took a significant proportion of Europe out of the Guelphic sphere of influence.

By the time of his death, Louis XI had destroyed all opposition from the nobility and set the standards for other absolutist monarchs to build upon - especially the archetypal Renaissance king, Francis I of France. Louis had demonstrated to the world what a ‘philosopher king’ could accomplishin a few years.

By consolidating power, Louis created the potential to smash Guelphic ultra-feudalism, a feat that was almost completed with the 1509 League of Cambrai assault on Venice. That he was wholly conscious of the forces of fragmentation and individual gain, against which he had led an uprising in the cause of the common good, isdemonstrated in his treatise, "Lessons for my Son", The Rosebush of Wars.


© John Dunn.

Crusaders

Thursday, 5 April 2018 at 20:50

March of humanity on Dr John Dunn. Medieval illuminated manuscript showing Peter the Hermit's People's Crusade of 1096


Wecome back to the point that there was no division between the inner and personal life of religion, and the practical interests of the external order. Each individual in the western world, for example, was part of anorder of faith that stretched from the parish church and manor, to kingship, the Holy Roman Empire and Christendom. The First Crusade, notable for not being merely a military operation, included vast numbers of ordinary men and women within a tide of humanity, known as the People’s Crusade, that swept across Europe towards the Holy Land, probably representing the high water mark of medieval social cohesion from emperor to vassal. Such a coalition of souls could never have been imposed by the political or economic despotism of a centralised power. It grew from an acceptance that to comply perfectly with one’s own specific function there was a need for an identical participation in the spirituality of the whole, conceived as a living organism. This kind of social order, with the sovereign at the centre, was the form within which the subjects demonstrated their faithfulness to God through faithfulness to their ruler. This faithfulness was a cornerstone of traditional society, in addition to work as rite and an elite that embodied transcendence. This was the force which as a magnet held together the social structure, establishing an implicit pull and gravitation between the individual and the centre, between the individual and the whole. It was a force acknowledged by Dante:

The essence of this blessed life consists
in keeping to the boundaries of God’s will,
Through which our wills become one single will.


© John Dunn.

Absolute

Wednesday, 4 April 2018 at 20:55

Louis IX on Dr John Dunn. It would take monarchical absolutism to break the grip of the Guelphic oligarchy by imposing order upon the chaos. The sweeping away of ultra-feudalism meant neutering the power of the nobility, whilst controlling trade by limiting the movement of goods, slaves and money. As a consequence, this also meant effectively policed national borders. Within these borders the monarch would be able to act as a servant of the commonwealth, i.e. govern on behalf of the physical and cultural enrichment of the people, as opposed to the deliberate holding back of development in the form of intensive labour by ignorant peasants, who could be easily and persistently exploited by having their surplus labour looted to no positive end for themselves.

The necessary coalescence of order out of chaos began in France. Louis XI (pictured above) tackled one element of the tripartite Guelphic alliance, the nobility, in an effort to break the grip of profiteering, usury and financial speculation that epitomised the era of ultra-feudalism. He imposed absolute royal authority, with the nobility unquestionably subservient to him.


© John Dunn.

November 2018
September 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3
8 10 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29          
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
Website design and CMS by WebGuild Media Ltd
This website ©2009-2018 John Dunn